Monday, January 25, 2010
I'd Do Anything for Love But I Won't Do That
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Hypocritical Justification
Forget for the moment those people living in ignorance - have the people making the objection repented of their sins and confessed Jesus as Lord? Likely not. They've rejected the gospel based on some other reason. So what difference does it make to people who reject the gospel as false that people on the other side of the world have never heard the gosepl in the first place? Such people are hypocritically trying to justify their own rejection of Christ.
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Billion Dollar Gift: "Not Good Enough"
I recently read in Matthew where Jesus was asked by some Jewish leaders to show a sign from heaven that Jesus was who He claimed to be. Jesus replied "A wicked and adulterous generation seeks a sign but no sign will be given except that of the prophet Jonah" (Matthew 16:4). He clarifies in Matthew 12:40 that just as Jonah was in the belly of the fish for three days and nights, so would He, the Son of Man, be three days and nights in the earth, referring to His burial after crucifixion.
I never really thought about the point Jesus was trying to make but upon reading that passage this time around it became very clear. Jesus Himself is the greatest sign that God could give to demonstrate that He exists and loves us and has a plan for our salvation. What greater sign could there be of God's existence and His care for us than that He come down to us in the flesh and teach us His ways? To ask a greater sign that that is to ask the impossible, like asking that someone make a square with three sides.
This statement of Christ's reveals the hypocrisy of Dawkins' remark about God hiding Himself. God gave the greatest and clearest sign of His character, intentions and requirements when He sent His Son into the world to "pitch His tent among us" (John 1:14). That was God's billion dollar gift to humanity. Dawkins in effect claims that sign is not enough implying that if only God revealed Himself more clearly Dawkins would have believed in Him. Yet it is a matter of record (The God Delusion) Dawkins' acrimonious view of God as revealed in the Bible. Regarding such people Jesus said "If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead" (Luke 16:31).
How like his father Adam who said "the woman that You gave to be with me, she gave me of the tree and I ate" (Genesis 3:12). Dawkins wants to believe that, in the chance that he is wrong about the existence of God, he has an adequate defense to make to God to avoid punishment for years of denying His existence: "Not guilty because I was not properly informed of Your requirements of me."
Yet Paul writes that men "supress the truth in unrighteousness because what may be know of God is manifest in them for God has shown it to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen...even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse" (Romans 1:18-20).
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Musings on Being One not Two
I've been watching a lot of TV lately and have noticed just how much sex etc. is in shows and movies. I've especially noticed women on TV and how much angst they demonstrate in regard to sex and relationships. The endless conversations about how much they want a man and how to figure men out and how to hang onto a man and on and on. For them, singleness is a curse and a plague. They strike me as lonely people looking for a man to take away the ache. I don't really relate. For the most part, the only time I really ache about being single is when I'm in love with someone who doesn't want me. When I'm not in love, I'm okay with being single. Right now, I'm happy with my life as it is. I have a decent job, good friends, interesting hobbies, plans for the future. My singleness doesn't weigh on me. It's incidental.
I signed up on eharmony just for kicks to see who I might be matched with. I got a number of responses but in the process it hit me that I wasn't serious. At all. Getting married is not a goal of mine. I have the desire to get married someday in the indeterminate future but a goal is something you are active about, something you work towards and am not actively involved in finding a mate, nor do I want to be.
The women on TV seem to carry a lot of baggage regarding men. Sometimes I want to shake them and say "What's the matter with you? Get a life!" But perhaps I've grown so accustomed to having my identity formed in Christ that I take it for granted. I assume everyone has a sense of destiny, purpose and eternal meaning in their lives. I know who I am and where I'm going. I know that what I do in this life will live on for eternity. I will never go into the void. I will never be forgotten. Perhaps this knowledge has, unconsciously, relieved me of the pressing need to have children to carry on my memory. Maybe it has formed my view on lonliness. Lonliness is universal and marriage is not its cure. Maybe God's love has soothed my soul in such a way that the sting of lonliness is gone. I get lonely but I know that it is temporary in this life and will be completely done away with in eternity. I don't need a man to form my identity or to save me from lonliness.
I am endlessly curious about men and relationships and sex but I think I have that in proper perspective which helps me avoid certain hangups.
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Publishing Process
Wow, my very own book!
